IPS vs. Retired IAS.

The Telangana High Court has ruled on a family dispute between IPS and retired IAS officers of Andhra Pradesh cadre. The Telangana High Court has rejected the orders issued by the RDO to withdraw the gift property.

The Telangana High Court has issued an important decision on the property dispute between PV Sunil Kumar in AP cadre and retired IAS officer PV Ramesh.

Property disputes have started between the two families in view of the marital disputes between PV Sunil and his wife. PV Sunil’s uncle .. P. Subbarao’s property was cut off in December 2019 in the name of grandson. For this, family disputes of PV Sunil’s wife have arisen. PV Sunil Satimani’s brother PV Ramesh retired as an IAS in AP cadre.

The Telangana High Court has made it clear that the donor cannot take the same property using the Senior Citizen Welfare Act after a property deed given to the grandson’s grandson.

PV Sunil’s son who resorted to court

Judge C.V. Bhaskar Reddy rejected. Senior IPS officer of Andhra Pradesh cadre P.V. Sunil Kumar’s son P. Orders were issued to allow Rohit Soria (23).

In 2019, his grandfather Sabbarao gifted two floors of the building in Kondapur to his two grandchildren – Rohit and his brother in 2019. Both are currently living in America.

In 2023, Subbarao filed a petition to Rajendranagar Ardivo and asked for recurrence of gift deeds of grandchildren under the Senior Citizen Act. Subbarao quoted Section 23 (1) of the Senior Citizen Welfare Act, alleging that his two grandchildren were not taking care of him.

RDO order for property acquisition

In January 2023, Ardivo Subbarao issued orders in favor of Ardivo Subbarao and ordered the cancellation of the award deed in the name of two grandchildren. Subbarao died in October 2023 months after RDO issued an order.

Rohit challenged RDO’s orders to cancel the award deed through his GPA. His lawyer, p. Roy Reddy argued.

Payvi Ramesh’s legal action on behalf of his father

Sabbarao’s son, AP’s retired IAS officer, P.V. Ramesh made a legal case on behalf of his father. PV Ramesh argued that after the death of the donor, the nephew had resorted to the court without any legal heirs.

PV Sunil’s sons told the court that they had not received any notice and were living abroad. After the rights of the recipient from the donor, they argued that they could not be canceled without proper procedure.

Judge Bhaskar Reddy said that after examining the gifts documents, the property transfer was completely in love and there was no condition for the donor. The High Court said that Section 23 Sudesh Chikkara vs Ramathi Devi does not apply to the Supreme Court’s decision.

Under the Senior Citizen Act, Ardivo rejected the orders. Senior Citizens are not eligible for the implementation of law and the dispute should be resolved through civil courts.